“Disability is a class in itself that anyone may fall victim
to at any time. It can come about as a result of a sudden accident, a fall down
a flight of stairs, or disease. Disability maintains no socio-economic
boundaries. Since disability catches up with most people in its fold in old
age, it is a class that any of us may fall in it someday.”
Even today the disabled in India see their physical or mental
limitations as either a source of shame or a source of inspiration for others.
By concentrating on overcoming the disability, we fail to notice that a
disability itself cannot be overcome by a disabled person, however, heroic she
or he may be. In the West, the Disability Rights Movement has realized this,
and, therefore, they proclaim that “it is okay, even good, to be disabled”.
The Disability Rights Movement :
Unlike other movements like Feminism or Lesbian Movements
which have distinct agendas of either gender justice or the right to sexual
orientation, the Disability Rights Movement does not have a systematic path.
Disability Rights Movement even in the West has a very recent origin and tries
to draw strength from the traditional legal order rather than by critiquing or
deconstructing it. Joseph Shapiro neatly summarises the characteristics of this
movement in the West: “The disability movement is a mosaic movement for the
1990s. Diversity is its critical characteristic. No leader or organization can
claim to speak for all the disabled“.
The Disability Rights Movement in India and Third World
countries is discursive and disorganized and there are no written documents to
trace its origin. Instead of coming together, sections of disabled viz. blind
persons, persons with a physical disability, deaf and dumb persons, and those
with mental disabilities have launched their movements and struggles
separately, mainly through NG0s. It was all the much difficult for all disabled
groups to come together with the stupendous diversities in their problems. Two
important reasons can be assigned for such a scenario.
Firstly, in our country, the disabled are bound to struggle
to fulfill basic needs like food, shelter, and education and therefore, they
are bound to be disable specific in their struggles. Secondly, the Advocates of
Disability Rights in India do not have any coherence in their agenda, some
stress solely on Rehabilitation and Research, others are solely concerned with
the generation of employment, and still, others are wholly occupied by efforts
in the education sector. A few in India ever talk about the ‘Civil Rights’ or
‘Crisis of identity’ of the disabled. Under such circumstances, the various
groups have to work segregated, and so they could not come together chalk out a
common agenda.
Actually in India, the Disability Rights Movement has been
launched by NGOs and therefore, a large number of NGOs have mushroomed all over
the country. Instead of working together to strengthen the movement, there is
often seen an unwarranted and unhealthy rivalry between NGOs. Similar conflicts
were also noted across different sections of the disabled. While several
organizations are making serious rehabilitation efforts and genuinely working
for the upliftment of the disabled there are also NGOs that are simply cashing
in on the cause just trying to pocket the funds and doing nothing for the
disabled.
Assumptions about the disabled:
Some stereotyped presumptions prevailed about the disabled in
our country like:
1. Disabled people are the most vulnerable section of society
and have been ignored by the state and society alike for a long.
2. Disabled people have always been dependent and, therefore,
need helping hands and gracious charity.
3. Disabled people are victims of their own bad luck.
4. Disableness is the punishment for sins he has never
committed in this life.
Such assumptions about the disabled do nothing to help them.
This approach perpetuates the stereotype of the disabled as victims and objects
of pity and charity.
Persons with disabilities are considered to have a very small
sphere to operate within owing to their limitations. So if a disabled person
achieves something beyond his/her small ‘sphere’ he/she is considered to have
almost overcome his/her disability. He/She is then presented as a role model
and a source of inspiration for the non-disabled community even. This image
hits the average disabled person very hard who does not have the capacity to
live up to such heroic standards. Average disabled people tend to compare their
‘little successes’ to the ‘large successes’ of their fellow disabled. This
leads to an inferiority complex among them.
Government’s Solace for the disabled:
Until 1995 no law even defined discrimination against people
with disabilities. It is only with the ‘Persons with Disabilities Act,’ passed
in 1995 that discrimination specifically against persons with disabilities came
under the purview of the law.
Till 1995, most of the welfare measures taken by the States
were by way of affirmative action. The Ministry of Social Welfare was largely
concerned with problems of persons with disabilities and with providing them
privileges. Rehabilitation of people with disability by opening shelter
workshops and educational and research institutions like the National Institute
of Visually Handicapped, Dehra Dun, the National Institute for the Mentally
Handicapped, Secunderabad, the National Institute for the Orthopaedically
Handicapped, Calcutta, and the Ali Anwar Jung National Institute for Hearing
Handicapped, Mumbai providing basic education to individuals with disability by
funding NGO s, opening special schools and awarding scholarships for students
with a disability, providing employment through job reservations mainly in
Class 3 and 4 in Central and State Government Departments and giving disabled
people travel concessions and installing awards for disabled workers and
institutions working for the welfare of the disabled. During the early ’80s,
some major developments in the International Disability Rights Movement brought
about a change in the attitude of the Government of India. The first earnest
sign was the enactment of the “Mental Health Act, 1987”. The Act is aimed at
protecting mentally ill persons in matters of admission and detention in
psychiatric hospitals and the custody of his/her persons, his/her property, and
its management and human rights.
Persons with Disabilities Act 1995
A meeting was convened by the Economic and Social Commission
for the Asia-Pacific region in Beijing in December 1992 to launch the
Asia-Pacific decade of disabled persons. The meeting declared 1993-2000 as the
Asia-Pacific decade and proclaimed the “full participation and equality of
people with disabilities” as the objective. To give legislative effect to the
above proclamation, the ‘Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunity,
Protection of Civil Rights, and Full Participation) Act was enacted in India in
1995 and came into force on 1st January 1996.
Objectives of the Act:
To spell out the responsibility of the State towards the
prevention of disabilities, protection of rights, provision of medical care,
education, training, employment, and rehabilitation of persons with
disabilities.
1. To create a barrier-free environment for disabled persons.
2. To remove any discrimination against disabled people in
the sharing of development benefits vis-à-vis non-disabled persons.
3. To counteract any situation of abuse and the exploitation
of disabled persons.
4. To lay down strategies for the development of comprehensive
programs and services and the equalization of opportunities for disabled
persons.
5. To make special provisions for the integration of persons
with disabilities into the social mainstream.
Critics:
A close study of the Act makes us feel “as if the Government
is a gracious donor and disabled persons are absolute dependents”. This is a
major stumbling block in the process of providing equal opportunities to the
disabled. Instead of focussing on the capabilities of disabled people, the Act
focuses very much on the activity limitations of the disabled and perpetuates
the victim image of disabled people.
Unfortunately, the Act does not pay any serious attention to
securing some basic rights like the right to human dignity, the right to equal
concern and respect, the right against discrimination in public employment and
educational institutions, the right against exploitation, the right against
victimization, etc.
The Act has completely ignored some vital aspects such as
Pre-school education of disabled children, special problems of the parents of
the disabled, special problems of the female disabled, games, sports and
cultural activities, exploitation of disabled by their own families, higher
education of the disabled.
Although the implementation of the Act has been gradual, it
does not mean that the Act has not helped the disabled at all. It has provided
a platform to unite and mobilize disabled individuals across the country. It is
also significant to witness the participation of the disabled in decision-making
processes through their representation in various policy-making and shaping
bodies under the Act.
The success of this Act would, however, depend much upon the
extent to which the political leaders and bureaucratic executive internalize
the values, sensibilities, and goals enshrined in the Act. If persons with
disabilities are to be regarded as full citizens of India, their right to equal
concern and respect must find its expression in the supreme law of the land.
0 Comment to "Rights of the Disabled"
Post a Comment